Stop reading the training. Step inside it.
Complex matters ask review teams to absorb case facts, training materials, review protocols, and documents quickly. mmData adds an immersive layer to that training, giving your team a way to step inside the materials, explore complex fact patterns, practice with representative documents, and receive immediate feedback before review begins.
Built for complex matters and designed around the decisions your review team needs to make.
Find the misunderstanding before it becomes a QC problem.
Attendance does not necessarily equal comprehension. A review team can only be as consistent as the training they receive. When misunderstandings are discovered after review begins, they can require more quality control review, sampling, clarifications, corrective training, additional meetings, and sometimes complete re-review.
Late clarification can increase QC review, sampling, and correction work.
Unclear expectations can make it harder for the review team to categorize documents consistently.
Corrective training, additional meetings, and re-review can add time and expense to the matter.
Better human decisions support better technology-assisted review.
Human judgment remains a critical input in many modern review workflows. When review decisions are inconsistent, the impact may extend beyond individual coding errors into quality-control processes and technology-assisted review. mmData is designed to improve understanding before those decisions begin at scale.
Today's AI-assisted review workflows depend on excellent review categorization protocols.
Training gaps become review problems.
A review team can only be as consistent as the training they receive. When the case team's expectations are not fully understood before review begins, the consequences can appear later through added quality control, lower accuracy, more clarification, corrective training, and re-review.
The facts haven't clicked
Review teams may not yet understand how the people, events, terminology, documents, and allegations fit together. That missing context can make complex decisions harder to evaluate consistently.
Misunderstandings surface during QC
When misunderstandings are discovered after review begins, teams may need additional quality control review, sampling, clarifications, corrective training, and meetings.
Corrections add time and cost
When expectations need to be clarified after coding is underway, the matter may require more senior review, additional remediation, or re-review of previously categorized documents.
Step inside the training, not just through it.
mmData's custom eDiscovery environments are designed to help review teams understand complex matters, explore training at their own pace, and practice the types of decisions they are likely to encounter during review.
Training and Case Documents
Give your review team a way to step inside training documents and case documents, rather than relying only on a flat reading experience.
Immersive Demonstratives
Put review teams and legal professionals inside complex fact patterns to support understanding of the matter and improve retention of complex information.
Self-Paced Exploration
Training environments can be used independently so members of the review team can explore the material at their own pace.
Review Protocol Support
mmData can also support the review protocol as part of the custom training approach, helping connect the case team's expectations to the training experience.
Gauge Testing with Representative Sample Documents
Your review team can encounter sample documents similar to the types they are likely to see during review, practice making coding decisions, receive immediate accuracy scores, and get feedback on complex decisions such as privilege and other matter-specific issues.
From your matter to a custom training environment.
Every matter is different. The process begins with understanding the review challenge, then preparing an estimate and custom budget for the training your team needs.
Tell us about the matter
Start with the review objectives, complexity, training needs, and the decisions your review team will be asked to make.
We prepare an estimate
mmData can prepare a custom budget based on the scope of the matter and the training experience required.
We build the experience
We prepare custom training environments, protocol support, demonstratives, and experiences for your team.
Your team trains and practices
The experience is built around the decisions your review team needs to make, with gauge testing and feedback where appropriate.
Built around the decisions your review team needs to make.
How does mmData test understanding?
Gauge testing lets your review team encounter representative sample documents, practice the types of coding decisions they are likely to make during review, and receive immediate accuracy scores and feedback. That feedback can also help highlight complex decisions that may need additional discussion or reinforcement.
Can this be used for an upcoming review?
Yes. Start by telling mmData about the matter, the review objectives, and the training challenge. From there, mmData can prepare an estimate and custom budget for an immersive training environment designed around the needs of that review.
How customized can the training be?
The training can be built around the matter, its documents, the review protocol, complex fact patterns, representative sample documents, and the decisions your review team needs to make. The exact scope is determined as part of the custom training estimate.
Before your review team opens the first document, make sure they understand the matter and their objectives.
Let mmData prepare an estimate for your next matter. We'll build a custom training environment, protocol support, and experiences for your team, designed around the decisions your review team needs to make.